How EU Regulations Are Reshaping Compliance Strategies in 2025
- Kodex AI
- Mar 25
- 6 min read
Updated: Jun 2
The European Union’s financial sector is undergoing a seismic transformation in 2025 as new regulatory frameworks reshape compliance strategies, operational resilience, and market transparency. With reforms spanning capital adequacy, digital resilience, ESG integration, crypto-asset oversight, and cross-sector risk management, financial institutions face both unprecedented challenges and opportunities to differentiate themselves through strategic compliance. This post explores the key mandates driving this change and their implications for banks, investment firms, and fintechs navigating Europe’s regulatory landscape.
CRR3/CRD6: Reinventing Capital Management and Risk Frameworks
The Capital Requirements Regulation III (CRR3), and Capital Requirements Directive (CRD6), effective January 1, 2025, represents the EU’s most comprehensive update to banking sector stability measures since the global financial crisis. Building on Basel III principles, CRR3 introduces stricter capital buffers, liquidity requirements, and risk-weighted asset calculations to fortify institutions against economic shocks.
A critical shift under CRR III is the mandatory integration of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks into capital adequacy assessments. Institutions must quantify climate-related transition risks in their mortgage portfolios and corporate lending activities, requiring advanced scenario analysis tools.
This aligns with the European Banking Authority’s (EBA) push to align financial stability with the EU’s sustainable finance agenda, particularly as global ESG assets under management are projected to reach $34 trillion by 2026.
Key Changes for Financial Institutions
1. Output Floor
A new cap ensures internal models cannot reduce capital requirements below 72.5% of what standardized approaches would dictate. This boosts consistency and limits regulatory arbitrage.
2. Credit Risk Reporting
Enhanced granularity across exposure types (e.g., retail, commercial real estate, defaulted exposures).
New exposure classes like "Subordinated Debt" and refinements in mortgage-related reporting.
Revised treatment of unconditionally cancellable commitments (UCCs) and off-balance-sheet items.
3. Operational Risk
Replacement of all legacy methods (BIA, TSA, AMA) with the Business Indicator Component (BIC) approach.
Introduction of new templates (C16.01) to reflect the revised capital calculation methodology.
Existing operational loss templates (C17.01 & C17.02) will remain temporarily, ensuring continuity until full implementation.
4. Market Risk and CVA
Delayed implementation of FRTB (Fundamental Review of the Trading Book) until 2026.
Updated templates to capture new CVA calculation methods and risk components.
Additional data now required on reclassifications between the trading and banking book.
5. Crypto Assets
Transitional reporting introduced ahead of full Basel-aligned crypto prudential rules in 2026.
Institutions must disclose exposure details as per Article 501d of CRR3.
6. Leverage Ratio
Minor updates including treatment of institutional protection schemes (IPS) and exposures to shareholders.
Adjustments reflect new credit risk frameworks and exclude certain exposures from the leverage denominator.
Compliance Timeline
Application Date: January 1, 2025
First Reporting Reference Date: March 31, 2025
Remittance Deadline (extended): End of June 2025 (originally mid-May)
DORA: Operational Resilience as a Compliance Strategy
The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), implemented on January 17, 2025, mandates a paradigm shift in how institutions manage cyber risks and IT disruptions. Unlike previous guidelines, DORA establishes legally binding standards for incident response times, third-party vendor oversight, and stress testing of critical systems.
Financial services have become heavily reliant on digital infrastructure—from cloud services to algorithmic trading systems. But with that reliance comes vulnerability. DORA seeks to create a harmonized EU framework that:
Closes gaps in national approaches to ICT risk.
Reduces fragmentation across the EU.
Bolsters sector-wide resilience to cyberattacks and digital disruptions.
Key Impacts for Financial Sector
1. Unified ICT Risk Management Standards
All financial entities must implement robust ICT risk frameworks that cover:
Identification and prevention of ICT risks.
Detection, response, and recovery procedures.
Backup, continuity, and contingency plans.
Proportionality applies: obligations scale based on the size, nature, and complexity of the institution.
2. Mandatory Incident Reporting
DORA introduces a streamlined, pan-European incident reporting system:
All major ICT-related incidents must be reported to the relevant competent authority.
Standardised templates, taxonomies, and timeframes will be defined by the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs).
A central EU incident hub may be established to coordinate reports and responses.
3. Digital Operational Resilience Testing
Institutions must regularly test their digital defense:
Requirements include everything from vulnerability assessments to Threat-Led Penetration Testing (TLPT).
Advanced TLPT is mandatory only for large/systemic entities.
Smaller firms may apply lighter testing based on their profile.
4. ICT Third-Party Risk Oversight
DORA imposes strict governance on third-party ICT providers, including:
Mandatory contractual clauses for audit rights, service levels, data protection, and exit strategies.
Institutions must maintain a detailed register of all ICT service contracts.
Critical ICT providers (e.g., major cloud vendors) will fall under a new EU Oversight Framework supervised by ESAs.
5. Oversight of Critical ICT Providers
DORA allows ESAs to designate and supervise “critical ICT third-party service providers”.
These providers must maintain an EU legal presence and cooperate with Lead Overseers appointed by the ESAs.
Non-compliance may lead to penalties and operational restrictions.
MiCAR: Creating Order in the Crypto Wild West
The Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR), fully implemented in 2025, establishes Europe as the first major jurisdiction with comprehensive crypto oversight.
Key provisions impacting compliance strategies include:
Reserve asset audits for stablecoin issuers (monthly reporting)
DeFi protocol liability frameworks for decentralized exchanges
NFT classification guidelines distinguishing collectibles from financial instruments
Crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) must now maintain real-time transaction ledgers accessible to national regulators, requiring blockchain analytics integration with legacy AML systems. The EBA’s phased licensing approach has created a bifurcated market, with early adopters like licensed stablecoin issuers gaining significant first-mover advantages.
Want to know how your company is affected by MiCAR, DORA or other major regulation?
Look no further! Our Discovery agent is a topic-specific AI assistant that helps to navigate and clarify new regulations and their implications, as well as create guidelines and compliance checklists. Request your demo today!
PSD3, Instant Payments and Transaction Transparency
The revised Payment Services Directive (PSD3) and EBA Instant Payment Reporting requirements are driving unprecedented transparency in retail banking. By April 9, 2025, institutions must:
Provide per-transaction cost breakdowns for SEPA instant payments;
Publicly report payment rejection rates and justification metrics;
Implement API-driven account verification systems.
These changes align with consumer demand for sub-10-second payment settlements, pushing banks to modernize core banking platforms. Early adopters are combining PSD3 compliance with value-added services like predictive cash flow analytics, turning regulatory costs into customer retention tools.
Key Impacts for Financial Institutions
1. Mandatory Instant Payments Offering
PSPs offering traditional euro credit transfers are now expected to also offer instant credit transfers to all customers.
Applies to all payment accounts reachable for regular credit transfers.
Instant payments must be available 24/7, every day of the year.
This includes all channels: online banking, mobile apps, ATMs, physical branches.
2. Execution Speed and Reliability
Funds must be credited to the recipient’s account within 10 seconds.
If a transaction fails or times out, the payer’s account must be restored immediately.
Batch (package) submissions of instant transfers are allowed and must be unpacked and processed individually in real time.
3. Pricing Rules
Charges for instant credit transfers must not exceed those for regular credit transfers.
Applies to per-transaction fees and bundled services, regardless of the payment channel or customer type.
4. Payee Verification Service
PSPs must provide a free service to confirm that the payee’s name matches the IBAN before the transaction is authorized.
This aims to reduce fraud and misdirected payments, with no added cost to the user.
Applies across all channels and also to bulk transactions, unless a non-consumer PSU opts out.
5. Sanctions Compliance: Streamlined Screening
Real-time sanctions screening during transaction execution is replaced by daily verification of customer records.
This reduces false positives and transaction rejections while preserving regulatory compliance.
6. Wider Access for Non-Bank PSPs
Payment institutions and electronic money institutions are now included in the scope of participation in designated payment systems.
Requirements introduced around fund safeguarding, governance, and continuity planning for these entities to ensure stability and fair competition.
7. Data Transparency and Reporting
PSPs must submit annual reports to competent authorities on:
Fees for credit and instant transfers
Rejection rates due to sanctions screening
Volume and value of instant payments
Reporting is expected to support ongoing evaluation and standardisation at EU level.
Compliance Timeline:
The implementation of Regulation (EU) 2024/886 will roll out gradually. Payment service providers (PSPs) located in euro-area Member States are expected to offer the ability to receive instant credit transfers by January 9, 2025, and to send them by October 9, 2025.
For PSPs in non-euro-area Member States, these deadlines are extended to January 9, 2027 for receiving and July 9 , 2027 for sending.
Conclusion
The regulatory landscape of 2025 isn’t just changing the rules — it’s rewriting the playbook for competitive advantage. At Kodex AI, we’ve built our platform on a fundamental insight: compliance isn’t a back-office function, but a frontline strategic capability.
Explore our client case studies or request a platform demo to see how compliance becomes your next differentiator.